We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
In [2]: to_datetime('20 Monday', format='%V %A') --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ValueError Traceback (most recent call last) Cell In[2], line 1 ----> 1 to_datetime('20 Monday', format='%V %A') File ~/pandas-dev/pandas/core/tools/datetimes.py:1100, in to_datetime(arg, errors, dayfirst, yearfirst, utc, format, exact, unit, infer_datetime_format, origin, cache) 1098 result = convert_listlike(argc, format) 1099 else: -> 1100 result = convert_listlike(np.array([arg]), format)[0] 1101 if isinstance(arg, bool) and isinstance(result, np.bool_): 1102 result = bool(result) # TODO: avoid this kludge. File ~/pandas-dev/pandas/core/tools/datetimes.py:442, in _convert_listlike_datetimes(arg, format, name, utc, unit, errors, dayfirst, yearfirst, exact) 439 require_iso8601 = format is not None and format_is_iso(format) 441 if format is not None and not require_iso8601: --> 442 return _to_datetime_with_format( 443 arg, 444 orig_arg, 445 name, 446 utc, 447 format, 448 exact, 449 errors, 450 ) 452 result, tz_parsed = objects_to_datetime64ns( 453 arg, 454 dayfirst=dayfirst, (...) 461 exact=exact, 462 ) 464 if tz_parsed is not None: 465 # We can take a shortcut since the datetime64 numpy array 466 # is in UTC File ~/pandas-dev/pandas/core/tools/datetimes.py:543, in _to_datetime_with_format(arg, orig_arg, name, utc, fmt, exact, errors) 540 return _box_as_indexlike(result, utc=utc, name=name) 542 # fallback --> 543 res = _array_strptime_with_fallback(arg, name, utc, fmt, exact, errors) 544 return res File ~/pandas-dev/pandas/core/tools/datetimes.py:485, in _array_strptime_with_fallback(arg, name, utc, fmt, exact, errors) 481 """ 482 Call array_strptime, with fallback behavior depending on 'errors'. 483 """ 484 try: --> 485 result, timezones = array_strptime( 486 arg, fmt, exact=exact, errors=errors, utc=utc 487 ) 488 except OutOfBoundsDatetime: 489 if errors == "raise": File ~/pandas-dev/pandas/_libs/tslibs/strptime.pyx:347, in pandas._libs.tslibs.strptime.array_strptime() 345 week_of_year = int(found_dict[group_key]) 346 if group_key == "U": --> 347 # U starts week on Sunday. 348 week_of_year_start = 6 349 else: ValueError: ISO week directive '%V' is incompatible with the year directive '%Y'. Use the ISO year '%G' instead.
I didn't use '%Y'
'%Y'
ValueError: ISO year directive '%V' must be used with the ISO week directive '%G' and a weekday directive '%A', '%a', '%w', or '%u'.
commit : b97d87195f0e8cb075cd2deb9203b0869f431b98 python : 3.8.15.final.0 python-bits : 64 OS : Linux OS-release : 5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 Version : #1 SMP Wed Mar 2 00:30:59 UTC 2022 machine : x86_64 processor : x86_64 byteorder : little LC_ALL : None LANG : en_GB.UTF-8 LOCALE : en_GB.UTF-8
pandas : 2.0.0.dev0+938.gb97d87195f.dirty numpy : 1.23.5 pytz : 2022.6 dateutil : 2.8.2 setuptools : 65.5.1 pip : 22.3.1 Cython : 0.29.32 pytest : 7.2.0 hypothesis : 6.61.0 sphinx : 4.5.0 blosc : 1.11.0 feather : None xlsxwriter : 3.0.3 lxml.etree : 4.9.2 html5lib : 1.1 pymysql : 1.0.2 psycopg2 : 2.9.5 jinja2 : 3.1.2 IPython : 8.7.0 pandas_datareader: None bs4 : 4.11.1 bottleneck : 1.3.5 brotli : fastparquet : 2022.12.0 fsspec : 2022.11.0 gcsfs : 2022.11.0 matplotlib : 3.6.2 numba : 0.56.4 numexpr : 2.8.4 odfpy : None openpyxl : 3.0.10 pandas_gbq : None pyarrow : 9.0.0 pyreadstat : 1.2.0 pyxlsb : 1.0.10 s3fs : 2022.11.0 scipy : 1.9.3 snappy : sqlalchemy : 1.4.45 tables : 3.7.0 tabulate : 0.9.0 xarray : 2022.12.0 xlrd : 2.0.1 zstandard : 0.19.0 tzdata : 2022.7 qtpy : None pyqt5 : None None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Pandas version checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
Reproducible Example
Issue Description
I didn't use
'%Y'
Expected Behavior
Installed Versions
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : b97d87195f0e8cb075cd2deb9203b0869f431b98
python : 3.8.15.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2
Version : #1 SMP Wed Mar 2 00:30:59 UTC 2022
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : en_GB.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_GB.UTF-8
pandas : 2.0.0.dev0+938.gb97d87195f.dirty
numpy : 1.23.5
pytz : 2022.6
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 65.5.1
pip : 22.3.1
Cython : 0.29.32
pytest : 7.2.0
hypothesis : 6.61.0
sphinx : 4.5.0
blosc : 1.11.0
feather : None
xlsxwriter : 3.0.3
lxml.etree : 4.9.2
html5lib : 1.1
pymysql : 1.0.2
psycopg2 : 2.9.5
jinja2 : 3.1.2
IPython : 8.7.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : 4.11.1
bottleneck : 1.3.5
brotli :
fastparquet : 2022.12.0
fsspec : 2022.11.0
gcsfs : 2022.11.0
matplotlib : 3.6.2
numba : 0.56.4
numexpr : 2.8.4
odfpy : None
openpyxl : 3.0.10
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : 9.0.0
pyreadstat : 1.2.0
pyxlsb : 1.0.10
s3fs : 2022.11.0
scipy : 1.9.3
snappy :
sqlalchemy : 1.4.45
tables : 3.7.0
tabulate : 0.9.0
xarray : 2022.12.0
xlrd : 2.0.1
zstandard : 0.19.0
tzdata : 2022.7
qtpy : None
pyqt5 : None
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: