We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandas.
>>> df_a = pd.DataFrame({"value": range(10), "idx1": [1] * 5 + [2] * 5, "idx2": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] * 2}).set_index(["idx1", "idx2"]) >>> df_b = pd.DataFrame({"value": range(5), "idx2": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]}).set_index("idx2") >>> df_a[:-1].groupby(level=0).rolling(2).cov(df_b) value idx1 idx1 idx2 1 1 1 NaN 2 0.5 3 0.5 4 0.5 5 0.5 2 1 NaN 2 NaN 3 NaN 4 NaN 2 1 1 NaN 2 NaN 3 NaN 4 NaN 5 NaN 2 1 NaN 2 0.5 3 0.5 4 0.5
xref: #44824 (comment)
Extra groups are introduced.
value idx1 idx2 1 1 NaN 2 0.5 3 0.5 4 0.5 5 0.5 2 1 NaN 2 0.5 3 0.5 4 0.5
commit : 193ca73 python : 3.8.12.final.0 python-bits : 64 OS : Darwin OS-release : 19.6.0 Version : Darwin Kernel Version 19.6.0: Tue Oct 12 18:34:05 PDT 2021; root:xnu-6153.141.43~1/RELEASE_X86_64 machine : x86_64 processor : i386 byteorder : little LC_ALL : None LANG : en_US.UTF-8 LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8
pandas : 1.4.0.dev0+1365.g193ca730d0 numpy : 1.21.4 pytz : 2021.3 dateutil : 2.8.2 pip : 21.3.1 setuptools : 59.1.0 Cython : 0.29.24 pytest : 6.2.5 hypothesis : 6.27.1 sphinx : 4.3.0 blosc : None feather : None xlsxwriter : 3.0.2 lxml.etree : 4.6.4 html5lib : 1.1 pymysql : None psycopg2 : None jinja2 : 3.0.3 IPython : 7.29.0 pandas_datareader: None bs4 : 4.10.0 bottleneck : 1.3.2 fsspec : 2021.11.0 fastparquet : 0.7.1 gcsfs : 2021.11.0 matplotlib : 3.4.3 numexpr : 2.7.3 odfpy : None openpyxl : 3.0.9 pandas_gbq : None pyarrow : 6.0.0 pyxlsb : None s3fs : 2021.11.0 scipy : 1.7.2 sqlalchemy : 1.4.27 tables : 3.6.1 tabulate : 0.8.9 xarray : 0.18.2 xlrd : 2.0.1 xlwt : 1.3.0 numba : 0.53.1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
take
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandas.
Reproducible Example
Issue Description
xref: #44824 (comment)
Extra groups are introduced.
Expected Behavior
Installed Versions
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : 193ca73
python : 3.8.12.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Darwin
OS-release : 19.6.0
Version : Darwin Kernel Version 19.6.0: Tue Oct 12 18:34:05 PDT 2021; root:xnu-6153.141.43~1/RELEASE_X86_64
machine : x86_64
processor : i386
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : en_US.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8
pandas : 1.4.0.dev0+1365.g193ca730d0
numpy : 1.21.4
pytz : 2021.3
dateutil : 2.8.2
pip : 21.3.1
setuptools : 59.1.0
Cython : 0.29.24
pytest : 6.2.5
hypothesis : 6.27.1
sphinx : 4.3.0
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : 3.0.2
lxml.etree : 4.6.4
html5lib : 1.1
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : 3.0.3
IPython : 7.29.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : 4.10.0
bottleneck : 1.3.2
fsspec : 2021.11.0
fastparquet : 0.7.1
gcsfs : 2021.11.0
matplotlib : 3.4.3
numexpr : 2.7.3
odfpy : None
openpyxl : 3.0.9
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : 6.0.0
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : 2021.11.0
scipy : 1.7.2
sqlalchemy : 1.4.27
tables : 3.6.1
tabulate : 0.8.9
xarray : 0.18.2
xlrd : 2.0.1
xlwt : 1.3.0
numba : 0.53.1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: