Skip to content

DOC: add ibis to pandas ecosystem #20483

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jreback opened this issue Mar 25, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #42554
Closed

DOC: add ibis to pandas ecosystem #20483

jreback opened this issue Mar 25, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #42554

Comments

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Mar 25, 2018

xref #20345

http://docs.ibis-project.org/

@jreback jreback added the Docs label Mar 25, 2018
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.23.0 milestone Mar 25, 2018
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Mar 25, 2018

cc @cpcloud @wesm

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche modified the milestones: 0.23.0, Next Major Release Mar 29, 2018
@westurner
Copy link
Contributor

@wesm what should the description be?

From https://github.com/ibis-project/ibis :

Ibis is a toolbox to bridge the gap between local Python environments, remote storage, execution systems like Hadoop components (HDFS, Impala, Hive, Spark) and SQL databases. Its goal is to simplify analytical workflows and make you more productive.

Should these be in the description block?:

Apache Impala (incubating)
Apache Kudu
Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS)
PostgreSQL
MySQL (Experimental)
SQLite
Pandas DataFrames (Experimental)
Clickhouse
BigQuery

@westurner
Copy link
Contributor

@wesm I suppose this isn't technically blocking #20345 for 0.23

@cpcloud
Copy link
Member

cpcloud commented Apr 15, 2018

This shouldn't block the release.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Apr 16, 2018

it’s not

@jreback jreback modified the milestones: Contributions Welcome, 1.4, 1.3.1 Jul 16, 2021
@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins linked a pull request Jul 16, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants