You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are some non-trivial simplifications (and perf improvements) in tslibs.np_datetime available if ujson can be made to not call pandas_datetimestruct methods directly. Is there a viable way to make the ujson code go through the tslibs cython instead of through src/datetime?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
if np_datetime only needed to handle use cases getting called from within tslibs, then most of the non-nano code could be ripped out. I think there were some other simplifcations i had in mind, but dont remember them ATM.
some hope that by eliminating the dependencies in setup.py we might speed up compilation and/or reduce the compiled size
There are some non-trivial simplifications (and perf improvements) in tslibs.np_datetime available if ujson can be made to not call pandas_datetimestruct methods directly. Is there a viable way to make the ujson code go through the tslibs cython instead of through src/datetime?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: