-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
PERF: performance regressions in 0.20.dev #16043
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Performance
Memory or execution speed performance
Comments
@jorisvandenbossche : Thanks for letting me know. Looking through the |
@jorisvandenbossche if possible can you re-run and re-post the top. |
if anyone wants to re-run. |
prob should re-run with master against this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Comparing 0.19.2 with the latest master, and using a factor of 1.5 as threshold, I get those:
I don't think there are real blockers for 0.20, but the sparse (cc @sinhrks) and
to_numeric
downcast (cc @gfyoung) seem to be systematically slowerThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: