Skip to content

pandas.Timestamp not in API Reference #14560

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
radekholy24 opened this issue Nov 2, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

pandas.Timestamp not in API Reference #14560

radekholy24 opened this issue Nov 2, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
Docs Duplicate Report Duplicate issue or pull request

Comments

@radekholy24
Copy link

A small, complete example of the issue

pandas.Timestamp cannot be found at http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/version/0.19.0/api.html

Expected Output

pandas.Timestamp to be there

Output of pd.show_versions()

pandas: 0.19.0
INSTALLED VERSIONS
------------------
commit: None
python: 3.5.2.final.0
python-bits: 64
OS: Linux
OS-release: 4.4.0-45-generic
machine: x86_64
processor: x86_64
byteorder: little
LC_ALL: None
LANG: en_US.UTF-8
LOCALE: en_US.UTF-8

pandas: 0.19.0
nose: None
pip: 7.1.0
setuptools: 18.0.1
Cython: None
numpy: 1.11.2
scipy: None
statsmodels: None
xarray: None
IPython: None
sphinx: None
patsy: None
dateutil: 2.5.3
pytz: 2016.7
blosc: None
bottleneck: None
tables: None
numexpr: None
matplotlib: None
openpyxl: None
xlrd: None
xlwt: None
xlsxwriter: None
lxml: None
bs4: None
html5lib: None
httplib2: None
apiclient: None
sqlalchemy: None
pymysql: None
psycopg2: None
jinja2: None
boto: None
pandas_datareader: None

Additional info

  1. It's a bit inconvenient for a newcomer to read Time Series / Date functionality over and over again in order to find out the API of the class.
  2. I can get rid of messages such as WARNING: po:obj reference target not found: pandas.Timestamp coming from Sphinx.
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

jorisvandenbossche commented Nov 2, 2016

See #5218 for the reason.

What we could do is maybe at least add the methods that are additional compared to datetim.datetime.

Want to do a PR for that?

@radekholy24
Copy link
Author

radekholy24 commented Nov 2, 2016

OH, I'd say that this is a duplicate of #5218 than :( I apologize for filing a duplicate. GitHub search engine does not find that if given "timestamp" and "documentation" keywords =-O

No promises but I can consider doing a PR in case of spare time, sure.

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added the Duplicate Report Duplicate issue or pull request label Nov 2, 2016
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche modified the milestones: 0.19.1, No action Nov 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Docs Duplicate Report Duplicate issue or pull request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants