Skip to content

On-Behalf-Of Flow support #1093

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jbakog opened this issue Jun 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

On-Behalf-Of Flow support #1093

jbakog opened this issue Jun 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
feature-request Improvements and additions to the library. investigation-needed Indication that the maintainer or involved community members may need to investigate more.

Comments

@jbakog
Copy link

jbakog commented Jun 29, 2021

Does the library support the On-Behalf-Of Flow (as per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8693) or will in a feature release?

@jeroenheijmans
Copy link
Collaborator

There is no support currently. Giving the low activity, or at least slowed down PR merging, I don't think it will become part of this library all to soon, if ever.

(Am not commenting on the value of supporting said flow, haven't delved to deep into it. Jus wanted to give a heads up on current status.)

@jeroenheijmans jeroenheijmans added feature-request Improvements and additions to the library. investigation-needed Indication that the maintainer or involved community members may need to investigate more. labels Jun 29, 2021
@manfredsteyer
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

I like this idea. I've just merged this PR. What do you think? Can we use this PR to also support the On-Behalf-Of-Flow?

#919

Ofc, a nice wrapper around it for this very use case wouldn't harm, but this might be a nice PR.

Best,
Manfred

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request Improvements and additions to the library. investigation-needed Indication that the maintainer or involved community members may need to investigate more.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants