-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 648
limactl copy
should use rsync
instead of scp
for copying a directory
#2198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
You could make it optional, like we ended up doing for
(my suggestion was Main reason is that it would require to install |
@AkihiroSuda Can I work on this? |
I found that I had to add --progress, to make the rsync output more similar to scp default output: |
Of course. |
is this still open to be worked on? @AkihiroSuda |
is this an open or closed issue? |
It is an open issue. It looks like it is waiting for #3143, which is still work in progress. |
Description
limactl copy
should usersync
(present on macOS by default) instead ofscp
for copying a directory.scp
might be still faster for small directories, but probably the overhead is subtle.lima/cmd/limactl/copy.go
Line 47 in eebc684
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: