Skip to content

Add handling for TPC to GetRegionFromZones #1910

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 17, 2025
Merged

Add handling for TPC to GetRegionFromZones #1910

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 17, 2025

Conversation

hanz-vora
Copy link
Contributor

@hanz-vora hanz-vora commented Jan 21, 2025 •
edited by amacaskill
Loading

Add handling for TPC to GetRegionFromZones

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Bug fix preventing PDCSI driver from being compatible with TPC

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Jan 21, 2025
@linux-foundation-easycla Linux Foundation: EasyCLA
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 21, 2025 •
edited
Loading

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @hanz-vora!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hanz-vora. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 21, 2025
@pwschuurman
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 3, 2025
@pwschuurman
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@hanz-vora
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2019

@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: amacaskill, hanz-vora

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 17, 2025
@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 17, 2025
@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 17, 2025
@hanz-vora
Copy link
Contributor Author

/release-note-none

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Mar 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 17, 2025
@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit daac2c6 into kubernetes-sigs:master Mar 17, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@amacaskill
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick release-1.17

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@amacaskill: new pull request created: #1998

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2025
Merged
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hanz-vora: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2019 47b6ecb link false /test pull-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-e2e-windows-2019

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pwschuurman pwschuurman pwschuurman left review comments

@amacaskill amacaskill Awaiting requested review from amacaskill

Assignees

@amacaskill amacaskill

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@hanz-vora @k8s-ci-robot @pwschuurman @amacaskill @k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot