Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2025. It is now read-only.

Commit 74fe014

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #314 from agilgur5/docs-typos
docs: fix typos in Concepts and FAQ
2 parents d9eb636 + 8bbf903 commit 74fe014

File tree

2 files changed

+4
-4
lines changed

2 files changed

+4
-4
lines changed

docs/user-guide/concepts.md

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -232,8 +232,8 @@ You can create a subnamespace from the command line via `kubectl hns create chil
232232
When you want to give some amount of resources to `team-a`, and want them to be able to
233233
flexibly use resources in any of their subnamespaces, you create a `HierarchicalResourceQuota`
234234
in namespace `team-a`. The sum of all resources from all the subnamespaces of the
235-
members wont be over the amount of resources that is configured in
236-
`HierarchicalResourceQuota` of namespace `team-a`. All of the reasources of `team-a` are
235+
members won't be over the amount of resources that is configured in
236+
`HierarchicalResourceQuota` of namespace `team-a`. All of the resources of `team-a` are
237237
equally shared between the applications in their subnamespaces, which is very efficient.
238238

239239
In addition, you can let an org or team's admin create their own hierarchical
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ company-a
251251
│ ...
252252
...
253253
```
254-
Instead of each team asking from the `cluster-admin` to modify their `ResourceQuota`,
254+
Instead of each team asking from the `cluster-admin` to modify their `ResourceQuota`,
255255
you can insert an additional "policy" namespace above each level to hold
256256
the policy objects (like hierarchical quota) that the sub-admin _cannot_
257257
change, while giving them permission to create their own quotas in the

docs/user-guide/faq.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ for any sane use case.
4747
## How does HNC scale?
4848

4949
HNC is deployed as a single pod with in-memory state, so it cannot scale
50-
horizontally. In practice, we have found the the API throttling by the K8s
50+
horizontally. In practice, we have found the API throttling by the K8s
5151
apiserver is by far the greatest bottleneck on HNC performance, which would not
5252
be improved via horizontal scaling. Almost all validating webhook calls are also
5353
served entirely by in-memory state and as a result should be extremely fast.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)