Skip to content

General pattern of unevaluated* keyword test cases #290

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
handrews opened this issue Oct 20, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

General pattern of unevaluated* keyword test cases #290

handrews opened this issue Oct 20, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
missing test A request to add a test to the suite that is currently not covered elsewhere.
Milestone
2019-09

Comments

@handrews
Copy link
Contributor

We need tests that ensure that the unevaluated* keywords are affected equally by adjacent keywords and keywords in in-place applicator subschemas.

This could be done just by testing that the appropriate annotations are propagated, so that the number of tests for assertion results can be kept lower. Or we could just repeat assertion tests with different arrangements w.r.t. subschemas.
@handrews handrews added this to the 2019-09 milestone Oct 20, 2019
@handrews handrews mentioned this issue Nov 27, 2019
Closed
@Julian Julian added the missing test A request to add a test to the suite that is currently not covered elsewhere. label Nov 29, 2019
@Julian
Copy link
Member

Julian commented Jul 1, 2022

We have decent coverage of unevaluatedItems and unevaluatedProperties it'd seem at this point. Obviously PRs / issues welcome if anyone notices specific gaps.

@Julian Julian closed this as completed Jul 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
missing test A request to add a test to the suite that is currently not covered elsewhere.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2019-09
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Julian @handrews