Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
@hasan-nn rexnet is a bit of a weird network to use for feature extractor, it has such small/odd numbered bottleneck channel counts. I didn't use the 1280 net.features as one of the feature pyarmid features because it was so much larger than the rest. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello there, I intend to use RexNet as a Feature extractor ( like for segmentation,object detection).
For rexnet_100 , the attribute 'feature_info' contains:
[{'num_chs': 16, 'reduction': 2, 'module': 'features.0'}, {'num_chs': 38, 'reduction': 4, 'module': 'features.2'}, {'num_chs': 61, 'reduction': 8, 'module': 'features.4'}, {'num_chs': 128, 'reduction': 16, 'module': 'features.10'}, {'num_chs': 185, 'reduction': 32, 'module': 'features.15'}]
Usually there are 5 extraction blocks with output_strides(reductions) = [2, 4, 8, 16, 32]
Given the above, I assume they are as follows:
and the last block in
net.features
is a rounded channel expansion to 1280 in rexnet_100 for the classifier head.Is this correct?
Thank you
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions