-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
fix: address failing 2D array compliance tests in DateArray #64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
test: add a test session with prerelease versions of dependencies
tests/unit/test_date_compliance.py
Outdated
return DateArray([None, datetime.date(2022, 1, 27)]) | ||
|
||
|
||
class Test2DCompat(base.NDArrayBacked2DTests): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that this class is only one of the base test classes you can inherit from to test compliance (and actually a class that tests functionality (2D aspect of the EA) that is currently not used in pandas).
You probably want to add the others as well (see https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/main/pandas/tests/extension/base/__init__.py for the different classes, and https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/main/pandas/tests/extension/decimal/test_decimal.py for an example that uses them)
This makes them consistent with other date/time dtypes, as well as internally consistent with the advertised `dtype.na_value`. BREAKING-CHANGE: dbdate and dbtime dtypes return NaT instead of None for missing values Release-As: 0.4.0
test: add a test session with prerelease versions of dependencies
…googleapis/python-db-dtypes-pandas into issue81-pandas-1.5.0-unit-tests
…into issue28-NDArrayBacked2DTests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM for style but perhaps someone from @googleapis/api-bigquery should be a final stamp just to make sure all is well from that end
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.4.0](v0.3.1...v0.4.0) (2022-03-24) ### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES * * fix: address failing compliance tests in DateArray and TimeArray * * fix: address failing compliance tests in DateArray and TimeArray * * fix: address failing compliance tests in DateArray and TimeArray * * fix: address failing compliance tests in DateArray and TimeArray * * fix: address failing compliance tests in DateArray and TimeArray * * fix: address failing compliance tests in DateArray and TimeArray * dbdate and dbtime dtypes return NaT instead of None for missing values ### Features * dbdate and dbtime support numpy.datetime64 values in array constructor ([1db1357](1db1357)) ### Bug Fixes * address failing 2D array compliance tests in DateArray ([#64](#64)) ([b771e05](b771e05)) * address failing tests with pandas 1.5.0 ([#82](#82)) ([38ac28d](38ac28d)) * allow comparison with scalar values ([#88](#88)) ([7495698](7495698)) * avoid TypeError when using sorted search ([#84](#84)) ([42bc2d9](42bc2d9)) * correct TypeError and comparison issues discovered in DateArray compliance tests ([#79](#79)) ([1e979cf](1e979cf)) * dbdate and dbtime support set item with null values ([#85](#85)) ([1db1357](1db1357)) * use `pandas.NaT` for missing values in dbdate and dbtime dtypes ([#67](#67)) ([f903c2c](f903c2c)) * use public pandas APIs where possible ([#60](#60)) ([e9d41d1](e9d41d1)) ### Tests * add dbtime compliance tests ([#90](#90)) ([f14fb2b](f14fb2b)) * add final dbdate compliance tests and sort ([#89](#89)) ([efe7e6d](efe7e6d)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Based on #82
test: add a test session with prerelease versions of dependencies
TODO:
Actually test against TimeArraywill do in subsequent PRsFix issues identified by TimeArray failuresFixes #65 🦕
Towards #28