Skip to content

fix: Update the root certificate for the BasicHttpsClient example #10911

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

fix: Update the root certificate for the BasicHttpsClient example #10911

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

blueskyson
Copy link
Contributor

The certificate is outdated. The current certificate can be found by openssl s_client -showcerts -connect jigsaw.w3.org:443.

Tests scenarios

I've tested on an ESP32 DEVKIT V1

Close #10825.

@blueskyson
Update HTTPS certificate in BasicHttpsClient.ino
cd1987a 
The certificate is outdated. The current certificate can be found using `openssl s_client -showcerts -connect jigsaw.w3.org:443`
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Warnings
⚠️

Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR:

  • the commit message "Update HTTPS certificate in BasicHttpsClient.ino":
    • body's lines must not be longer than 100 characters
    • summary looks empty
    • type/action looks empty

Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips:

  • follow Conventional Commits style
  • correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue
  • allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test
  • sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 10 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter
  • avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers)

TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).

👋 Hello blueskyson, we appreciate your contribution to this project!

📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.
🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.
Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against cd1987a

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Memory usage test (comparing PR against master branch)

The table below shows the summary of memory usage change (decrease - increase) in bytes and percentage for each target.

MemoryFLASH [bytes]FLASH [%]RAM [bytes]RAM [%]
TargetDECINCDECINCDECINCDECINC
ESP32P4000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32S3000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32S2000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32C3000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32C6000.000.00000.000.00
ESP32000.000.00000.000.00
Click to expand the detailed deltas report [usage change in BYTES]
TargetESP32P4ESP32S3ESP32S2ESP32C3ESP32C6ESP32
ExampleFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAMFLASHRAM
HTTPClient/examples/BasicHttpsClient000000000000

@me-no-dev me-no-dev added the Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged label Jan 30, 2025
@me-no-dev me-no-dev merged commit f22866f into espressif:master Jan 30, 2025
25 checks passed
@babski123
Copy link

Have we figured out if NetworkClientSecure checks validity?
The clock is taking forever to load

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@me-no-dev me-no-dev me-no-dev approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BasicHttpsClient example rootCACertificate is outdated
4 participants
@blueskyson @CLAassistant @babski123 @me-no-dev