We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
1 parent 239b242 commit c7e0e4aCopy full SHA for c7e0e4a
regression/cbmc/Pointer_byte_extract5/no-simplify.desc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1
-CORE
+CORE broken-smt-backend
2
main.i
3
--bounds-check --32 --no-simplify
4
^EXIT=10$
@@ -10,5 +10,7 @@ array\.List dynamic object upper bound in p->List\[2\]: FAILURE
10
--
11
Test is built from SV-COMP's memsafety/20051113-1.c_false-valid-memtrack.c.
12
C90 did not have flexible arrays, and using arrays of size 1 was common
13
-practice: http://c-faq.com/struct/structhack.html. We need to treat those as if
14
-it were a zero-sized array.
+practice: http://c-faq.com/struct/structhack.html. But past C90 using
+non-flexible members for struct-hack is undefined, hence we changed the test to
15
+use flexible member instead. That is not currently supported by our smt
16
+conversion: zero-sized arrays.
0 commit comments