Skip to content

Commit 320a9f8

Browse files
author
Remi Delmas
committed
Havoc the function call's return value when replacing it by its contract.
This was not done previously and could result in vacuous proofs when multiple calls to a same function were replaced in a same scope.
1 parent 1e8e495 commit 320a9f8

File tree

3 files changed

+74
-10
lines changed

3 files changed

+74
-10
lines changed
Lines changed: 23 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
1+
int cmp(int i1, int i2)
2+
// clang-format off
3+
__CPROVER_ensures((i1 == i2) ==> (__CPROVER_return_value == 0))
4+
__CPROVER_ensures((i1 != i2) ==> (__CPROVER_return_value == -1))
5+
// clang-format on
6+
{
7+
if(i1 == i2)
8+
return 0;
9+
else
10+
return -1;
11+
}
12+
13+
int main()
14+
{
15+
int ret = -1;
16+
ret = cmp(0, 0);
17+
__CPROVER_assert(ret == 0, "expecting SUCCESS");
18+
ret = cmp(0, 1);
19+
__CPROVER_assert(ret == 0, "expecting FAILURE");
20+
__CPROVER_assert(ret == -1, "expecting SUCCESS");
21+
__CPROVER_assert(0, "expecting FAILURE");
22+
return 0;
23+
}
Lines changed: 20 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
1+
CORE
2+
main.c
3+
--replace-call-with-contract cmp
4+
^EXIT=10$
5+
^SIGNAL=0$
6+
^\[main\.assertion\.1\] line \d+ expecting SUCCESS: SUCCESS$
7+
^\[main\.assertion\.2\] line \d+ expecting FAILURE: FAILURE$
8+
^\[main\.assertion\.3\] line \d+ expecting SUCCESS: SUCCESS$
9+
^\[main\.assertion\.4\] line \d+ expecting FAILURE: FAILURE$
10+
^\*\* 2 of 4 failed
11+
^VERIFICATION FAILED$
12+
--
13+
--
14+
This test checks that the return value of a replaced function call is made
15+
nondet at each replacement site.
16+
The replaced function is called twice. Each call is expected to have a different
17+
return value. If the return value of the call is not made nondet at each
18+
replacement, it would be subject to contradictory constraints
19+
(from the post conditions) and the assertions expected to fail would
20+
be vacuously satisfied.

src/goto-instrument/contracts/contracts.cpp

Lines changed: 31 additions & 10 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ Date: February 2016
2323
#include <goto-instrument/havoc_utils.h>
2424

2525
#include <goto-programs/goto_inline.h>
26+
#include <goto-programs/goto_program.h>
2627
#include <goto-programs/remove_skip.h>
2728

2829
#include <langapi/language_util.h>
@@ -631,6 +632,10 @@ bool code_contractst::apply_function_contract(
631632
// with expressions from the call site (e.g. the return value).
632633
// This object tracks replacements that are common to ENSURES and REQUIRES.
633634
replace_symbolt common_replace;
635+
636+
// keep track of the call's return expression to make it nondet later
637+
optionalt<exprt> call_ret_opt = {};
638+
634639
if(type.return_type() != empty_typet())
635640
{
636641
// Check whether the function's return value is not disregarded.
@@ -640,9 +645,10 @@ bool code_contractst::apply_function_contract(
640645
// For example, if foo() ensures that its return value is > 5, then
641646
// rewrite calls to foo as follows:
642647
// x = foo() -> assume(__CPROVER_return_value > 5) -> assume(x > 5)
643-
symbol_exprt ret_val(
644-
CPROVER_PREFIX "return_value", const_target->call_lhs().type());
645-
common_replace.insert(ret_val, const_target->call_lhs());
648+
auto &lhs_expr = const_target->call_lhs();
649+
call_ret_opt = lhs_expr;
650+
symbol_exprt ret_val(CPROVER_PREFIX "return_value", lhs_expr.type());
651+
common_replace.insert(ret_val, lhs_expr);
646652
}
647653
else
648654
{
@@ -663,7 +669,9 @@ bool code_contractst::apply_function_contract(
663669
ns,
664670
symbol_table);
665671
symbol_exprt ret_val(CPROVER_PREFIX "return_value", type.return_type());
666-
common_replace.insert(ret_val, fresh.symbol_expr());
672+
auto fresh_sym_expr = fresh.symbol_expr();
673+
common_replace.insert(ret_val, fresh_sym_expr);
674+
call_ret_opt = fresh_sym_expr;
667675
}
668676
}
669677
}
@@ -736,8 +744,10 @@ bool code_contractst::apply_function_contract(
736744
targets.add_to_operands(std::move(target));
737745
common_replace(targets);
738746

739-
// Create a series of non-deterministic assignments to havoc the variables
740-
// in the assigns clause.
747+
// Create a sequence of non-deterministic assignments...
748+
goto_programt havoc_instructions;
749+
750+
// ...for assigns clause targets
741751
if(!assigns.empty())
742752
{
743753
assigns_clauset assigns_clause(
@@ -747,14 +757,25 @@ bool code_contractst::apply_function_contract(
747757
modifiest modifies;
748758
modifies.insert(targets.operands().cbegin(), targets.operands().cend());
749759

750-
goto_programt assigns_havoc;
751760
havoc_assigns_targetst havoc_gen(modifies, ns);
752-
havoc_gen.append_full_havoc_code(location, assigns_havoc);
761+
havoc_gen.append_full_havoc_code(location, havoc_instructions);
762+
}
753763

754-
// Insert the non-deterministic assignment immediately before the call site.
755-
insert_before_swap_and_advance(function_body, target, assigns_havoc);
764+
// ...for the return value
765+
if(call_ret_opt.has_value())
766+
{
767+
auto &call_ret = call_ret_opt.value();
768+
auto &loc = call_ret.source_location();
769+
auto &type = call_ret.type();
770+
side_effect_expr_nondett expr(type, location);
771+
auto target = havoc_instructions.add(
772+
goto_programt::make_assignment(call_ret, expr, loc));
773+
target->code_nonconst().add_source_location() = loc;
756774
}
757775

776+
// Insert havoc instructions immediately before the call site.
777+
insert_before_swap_and_advance(function_body, target, havoc_instructions);
778+
758779
// To remove the function call, insert statements related to the assumption.
759780
// Then, replace the function call with a SKIP statement.
760781
if(!ensures.is_false())

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)