-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 934
Rename project to a more generic name #9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hey @gajus, thanks for your suggestion! I chose the name due to the fact this tool uses conventional-commits-parser under the hood, which basically limits it to conventional-changelog semantics. To hold true to the Most likely this is a sizeable chunk of work which I'm currently not planing to invest into this topic. Given we can muster some collaboration effort and fill the broader scope I'd rename the project. |
Do you have specific rules in mind that you think would be required to move from the current project scope to It seems that you already have quite a broad coverage. Even compared to services such as https://gitcop.com/, conventional-changelog-lint implements more rules. |
I think this of this more as a matter of entanglement with Perhaps this is not as relevant as I first thought – I'd have to search for a commit convention that could not be linted with this to prove my point. What type of convention are you testing via |
Basically, Angular convention minus the scopes. |
Thought about splitting the angular convention in distinct parts - the scopes could be one of them... |
Will rename to commitlint or gitlint eventually. Things to do before this: |
Done! |
The current project name (
conventional-changelog-lint
) implies that this tool is designed to be used withconventional-changelog
. Regardless of whether thats true or not, the tool itself has potential for broader applications.A good name would be something like
commitlint
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: