You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/introduction/introduction.md
+5-6
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -35,12 +35,12 @@ directly back to the PR or MR.
35
35
### Data, Privacy, and Security
36
36
37
37
**CodeRabbit** does not use data collected during code reviews to train or
38
-
influence the models. Queries to the Large Language Model (LLM) are ephemeral.
38
+
influence the models. Queries to the Large Language Model (LLM) are ephemeral and there is zero data retention on LLMs.
39
39
Neither we nor the LLM we use share any data collected during the code review
40
40
process with other third parties.
41
41
42
-
Does CodeRabbit store my Data? We store embeddings of your conversations, which
43
-
are used to improve future reviews for your organization.
42
+
Does CodeRabbit store my Data?
43
+
CodeRabbit enhances future reviews for your organization by storing the embeddings of the learnings generated from chat conversations. Additionally, it integrates embeddings from issues in workflow systems (Liner, Jira, GitHub/GitLab issues) to assess the impact of code changes on existing issues
44
44
45
45
Compliance and Data Privacy: Your data is kept confidential, isolated by the
46
46
organization, and used only to improve your organization reviews. Data storage
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ complies with SOC2 Type II, GDPR, and HIPAA standards.
49
49
Opting Out: You can choose to opt out of data storage at any time. Opting out
50
50
won't affect your access but will limit the personalization of the reviews.
51
51
52
-
### Do you need CodeRabbit with the AI code generators or co-pilot?
52
+
### Do you need CodeRabbit with the AI code generators like GitHub Copilot?
53
53
54
54
Code reviews remain essential, whether the code is written by a human or a bot.
55
55
This is mainly because the perspective of the reviewer differs from that of the
### How is CodeRabbit different from existing code review tools?
63
63
64
-
Existing code review tools are good at linting and static code analysis;
65
-
however, they lack context-aware, human-like review feedback.
64
+
Traditional code review tools excel in linting and static analysis, but they fall short in providing context-aware, conversational feedback with actionable suggestions for changes that can be directly committed.
66
65
67
66
For information on how to get started with **CodeRabbit**, please visit the
0 commit comments