Add PR Event Logger workflow and authentication methods; remove old r… #1
Conversation
starting |
|
/codehelper |
|
Warning There is an error in the Gemini Code Assist config file for this repository at |
![do-refacto[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1142269?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
WalkthroughThis update introduces new authentication and GitHub API utility modules, adds a README, and configures a new GitHub Actions workflow for logging pull request events. It also removes an existing workflow that performed cryptographic event processing and deletes all webhook handling logic from the listener module, leaving it empty. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GitHub
participant GitHub Actions (PR Event Logger)
GitHub->>GitHub Actions (PR Event Logger): PR/issue comment event (opened, edited, etc.)
GitHub Actions (PR Event Logger)->>GitHub Actions (PR Event Logger): Checkout repo, setup Python, echo secrets
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant README
participant Developer Environment
User->>README: Read setup instructions
User->>Developer Environment: Install dependencies, run server, setup ngrok
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
/codehelper review |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
listener.py (1)
1-2: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove or repurpose the empty file.
This file now only contains
##which appears to be an incomplete comment or placeholder. Since all webhook handling logic has been moved to other modules (auth.pyandgithub.py), consider either:
- Deleting this file entirely if it's no longer needed
- Adding meaningful content if this file will be used in the future
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.bot (1)
1-2:⚠️ Potential issueCritical Security Risk: Remove hardcoded credentials immediately.
This file contains hardcoded credentials which poses a severe security risk. These credentials are exposed in plain text and accessible to anyone with repository access.
Immediate Actions Required:
- Remove this file from the repository
- Invalidate/rotate these credentials immediately
- Store credentials securely using GitHub Secrets or environment variables
- Update any code that references these credentials to use secure storage
-ID=Iv23liGyTZJYhySo4cEM -SECRET=a0d16e1977f5dbd754649d9daa7d19d8ef32f38b🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
2-2: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
github.py (1)
16-27: Well-implemented retry logic with proper error handling!The function now includes comprehensive error handling that addresses the previous review comment's concerns:
- Try/except blocks for request exceptions
- Retry mechanism with exponential backoff
- Proper logging of failures
- Timeout configuration on requests
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
auth.py (1)
7-31: Cryptographic implementation looks solid.The
decrypt_tokenfunction correctly implements AES-256-CBC decryption with proper key derivation and includes good defensive programming with the padding fallback logic.Minor suggestion for improved error handling:
Consider adding more specific error handling for the base64 decoding step:
- # Base64 decode the encrypted token - encrypted_data = base64.b64decode(encrypted_token) + # Base64 decode the encrypted token + try: + encrypted_data = base64.b64decode(encrypted_token) + except Exception as e: + raise ValueError(f"Invalid base64 encoded token: {e}")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.bot(1 hunks).github/workflows/pr-reviewer.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/reviewer.yml(0 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)auth.py(1 hunks)github.py(1 hunks)listener.py(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/reviewer.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
.bot
2-2: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/pr-reviewer.yml
17-17: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/pr-reviewer.yml
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 26-26: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
auth.py (1)
34-38: Excellent implementation of webhook signature verification.The function correctly implements GitHub webhook signature verification using HMAC-SHA256 and includes timing attack protection with
hmac.compare_digest().
| # PR Reviewer bot | ||
| A bot that helps you to review the PRs in your repository. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Get started | ||
|
|
||
| ### Install the dependencies | ||
| ```bash | ||
| pip3 install -r requirements.txt | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### To run the bot | ||
| ```bash | ||
| uvicorn main:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000 --reload | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Forward the port using ngrok | ||
| ```bash | ||
| ngrok http 8000 | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance documentation with more comprehensive information.
The README provides basic setup instructions but could be more helpful with additional details.
Suggested improvements:
# PR Reviewer bot
-A bot that helps you to review the PRs in your repository.
+A bot that helps you to review the PRs in your repository by providing automated analysis and feedback.
## Get started
+### Prerequisites
+- Python 3.9 or higher
+- A GitHub repository with webhook access
+- ngrok (optional, for local development)
+
### Install the dependencies
```bash
pip3 install -r requirements.txt+### Configuration
+Set up the required environment variables or update the configuration as needed.
+
To run the bot
uvicorn main:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000 --reloadForward the port using ngrok
+For local development and testing:
ngrok http 8000+## Features
+- Automated PR review and analysis
+- GitHub webhook integration
+- Secure authentication and token handling
<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>
In README.md lines 1 to 19, the documentation is minimal and lacks important
details. Enhance it by adding a "Configuration" section that explains setting up
environment variables or configuration files needed for the bot. Also, add a
"Features" section listing key functionalities like automated PR review, GitHub
webhook integration, and secure authentication. This will provide users with
clearer guidance and a better understanding of the bot's capabilities.
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
| - name: log existing secrets | ||
| env: | ||
| API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.API_TOKEN }} | ||
| WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.WEBHOOK_SECRET }} | ||
| ORG_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.ORG_TOKEN }} | ||
| run: echo $API_TOKEN $WEBHOOK_SECRET $ORG_TOKEN |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical Security Issue: Secrets exposed in workflow logs.
The workflow logs secrets to stdout, which exposes them in GitHub Actions logs where they can be viewed by anyone with repository access.
Remove the secret logging immediately:
- - name: log existing secrets
- env:
- API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.API_TOKEN }}
- WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.WEBHOOK_SECRET }}
- ORG_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.ORG_TOKEN }}
- run: echo $API_TOKEN $WEBHOOK_SECRET $ORG_TOKEN
+ - name: Verify secrets exist
+ env:
+ API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.API_TOKEN }}
+ WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.WEBHOOK_SECRET }}
+ ORG_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.ORG_TOKEN }}
+ run: |
+ if [ -z "$API_TOKEN" ]; then echo "API_TOKEN not set"; exit 1; fi
+ if [ -z "$WEBHOOK_SECRET" ]; then echo "WEBHOOK_SECRET not set"; exit 1; fi
+ if [ -z "$ORG_TOKEN" ]; then echo "ORG_TOKEN not set"; exit 1; fi
+ echo "All required secrets are configured"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: log existing secrets | |
| env: | |
| API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.API_TOKEN }} | |
| WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.WEBHOOK_SECRET }} | |
| ORG_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.ORG_TOKEN }} | |
| run: echo $API_TOKEN $WEBHOOK_SECRET $ORG_TOKEN | |
| - name: Verify secrets exist | |
| env: | |
| API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.API_TOKEN }} | |
| WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.WEBHOOK_SECRET }} | |
| ORG_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.ORG_TOKEN }} | |
| run: | | |
| if [ -z "$API_TOKEN" ]; then echo "API_TOKEN not set"; exit 1; fi | |
| if [ -z "$WEBHOOK_SECRET" ]; then echo "WEBHOOK_SECRET not set"; exit 1; fi | |
| if [ -z "$ORG_TOKEN" ]; then echo "ORG_TOKEN not set"; exit 1; fi | |
| echo "All required secrets are configured" |
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 26-26: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/pr-reviewer.yml around lines 21 to 26, the workflow logs
sensitive secrets to stdout, exposing them in GitHub Actions logs. Remove the
entire step or at least the run command that echoes the secrets to prevent them
from being printed in the logs and ensure secrets remain confidential.
| uses: actions/setup-python@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| python-version: '3.9' | ||
|
|
||
| - name: log existing secrets | ||
| env: | ||
| API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.API_TOKEN }} | ||
| WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.WEBHOOK_SECRET }} | ||
| ORG_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.ORG_TOKEN }} | ||
| run: echo $API_TOKEN $WEBHOOK_SECRET $ORG_TOKEN |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix workflow formatting and version issues.
Static analysis identified several issues that should be addressed.
Apply these fixes:
- name: Set up Python
- uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+ uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: '3.9'
- - name: log existing secrets
- env:
+ - name: log existing secrets
+ env:
API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.API_TOKEN }}
WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.WEBHOOK_SECRET }}
ORG_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.ORG_TOKEN }}
- run: echo $API_TOKEN $WEBHOOK_SECRET $ORG_TOKEN
+ run: echo $API_TOKEN $WEBHOOK_SECRET $ORG_TOKENCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
17-17: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 26-26: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/pr-reviewer.yml around lines 17 to 26, the workflow
formatting is incorrect and the Python setup action version should be updated.
Fix the indentation and structure of the YAML to comply with GitHub Actions
syntax, and update the actions/setup-python version to the latest stable release
(e.g., v4). Also, ensure environment variables are properly referenced and
echoed in the run step without syntax errors.
| """Fetch the list of commits for a PR from GitHub API with retries and exception handling.""" | ||
| url = f"https://api.github.com/repos/{repo_full_name}/pulls/{pr_number}/commits" | ||
| headers = { | ||
| "Authorization": f"{github_token}", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the Authorization header format.
The Authorization header should include the authentication scheme. GitHub API expects either Bearer or token prefix.
Apply this diff to fix the header format:
- "Authorization": f"{github_token}",
+ "Authorization": f"Bearer {github_token}",If the token is a personal access token (classic), you can also use:
- "Authorization": f"{github_token}",
+ "Authorization": f"token {github_token}",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "Authorization": f"{github_token}", | |
| "Authorization": f"Bearer {github_token}", |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In github.py at line 12, the Authorization header is missing the required
authentication scheme prefix. Update the header value to include the prefix
"Bearer " or "token " before the github_token variable to comply with GitHub API
requirements.
| API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.API_TOKEN }} | ||
| WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.WEBHOOK_SECRET }} | ||
| ORG_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.ORG_TOKEN }} | ||
| run: echo $API_TOKEN $WEBHOOK_SECRET $ORG_TOKEN |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical Security Issue: This workflow step exposes sensitive secrets in GitHub Actions logs. The echo $API_TOKEN $WEBHOOK_SECRET $ORG_TOKEN command will print all secrets to the build logs, making them accessible to anyone with repository access. Remove this step immediately and rotate the exposed credentials.
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
| ID=Iv23liGyTZJYhySo4cEM | |||
| SECRET=a0d16e1977f5dbd754649d9daa7d19d8ef32f38b | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical Security Issue: Hardcoded credentials should never be committed to version control. This file contains what appears to be actual GitHub App ID and secret values. Remove this file immediately, add .bot to .gitignore, and rotate these credentials.
…eviewer agent
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
Bug Fixes