Rename project to "devcontainer"

[ammario]

There is great demand to use devcontainers with coder, but this project's name makes it difficult for those users to find it.

cc @kylecarbs

[kylecarbs]

Calling it devcontainer is kind of weird because it's a devcontainer implementation in Go. I'm not a fan of the go- abbreviation because this is also somewhat of a unique implementation that relieves some of the rigidity of the JavaScript one.

Maybe devcontainer-builder?

[matifali]

May I suggest devbuilder?

[ammario]

Calling it devcontainer is kind of weird because it's a devcontainer implementation in Go.

Kind of confused by this since devcontainer is supposed to be an open spec and this is an implementation of it.

[matifali]

@bpmct, if in future it is planned to support other filespecs as requested in #113. We should not change the name and IMO the current name envbuilder is the most suitable.

[bpmct]

We have a call next week to discuss this. The current popular name is devcontainer-builder

[bpmct]

We're kind of landing on envbuilder... Closing for now