Skip to content

Evaluate batchtools #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Tracked by #4
dshemetov opened this issue Sep 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
Tracked by #4

Evaluate batchtools #1

dshemetov opened this issue Sep 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dshemetov
Copy link
Contributor

dshemetov commented Sep 12, 2023

  • Use batchtools to do covid forecast evaluation
  • Use batchtools to do flu forecast evaluation
  • Confirm that arrow/parquet interacts well with it
@dsweber2 dsweber2 self-assigned this Sep 12, 2023
@dsweber2
Copy link
Contributor

dsweber2 commented Sep 12, 2023

see if chunk jobs will let us do forecaster dependency tree They will not. If we want to do sequential jobs, we're probably going to want to use tags to say 1st wave (independent forecasters), second wave (ensembles), third wave (ensembles containing ensembles), etc.

@dsweber2 dsweber2 added this to the initial exploration milestone Sep 13, 2023
@dsweber2
Copy link
Contributor

Major thing left to test is what happens with parallelization.

@dsweber2
Copy link
Contributor

A limitation is that summarizeExperiments won't print jobs with parameters that are lists. Those jobs will run fine however

@dshemetov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ended up going with targets because it supports a notion of job dependence and allows for parameter sweeps across lists of complex objects (such as different trainers).

  • Built out a prototype job with file targets
  • Built out a prototype forecaster target
  • Built out a prototype ensemble forecaster target
  • Built out a parameter sweep job using tarchetypes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants