Skip to content

Consider (nonchecking) constructor + validator + helper (constructor) pattern #301

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
brookslogan opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider (nonchecking) constructor + validator + helper (constructor) pattern #301

brookslogan opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
op-semantics Operational semantics; many potentially breaking changes here P2 low priority

Comments

@brookslogan
Copy link
Contributor

Described here. Related: #166, #221. Interacts with #133, #186, #280.
@brookslogan brookslogan added P2 low priority op-semantics Operational semantics; many potentially breaking changes here labels Apr 14, 2023
@brookslogan brookslogan mentioned this issue May 5, 2023
Open
@brookslogan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe this is a combination of done + refiled into more specific issues.

@brookslogan brookslogan closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
op-semantics Operational semantics; many potentially breaking changes here P2 low priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@brookslogan