Skip to content

Consider using setters to validate epi_archive settings #282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
brookslogan opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider using setters to validate epi_archive settings #282

brookslogan opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
P3 very low priority REPL Improved print, errors, etc.

Comments

@brookslogan
Copy link
Contributor

Prevent, e.g., overriding versions_end with an incompatible type or invalid value. When two/more fields need to share a particular relationship this might introduce some implementation/interface complications, though.
@brookslogan brookslogan added P3 very low priority REPL Improved print, errors, etc. labels Mar 20, 2023
@brookslogan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Potentially part of #449. Closing this as duplicate; can be re-opened if work on #449 concludes without addressing.

@brookslogan brookslogan closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
P3 very low priority REPL Improved print, errors, etc.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@brookslogan