Change start of NamedIndividuals' suffices to use last path-segment of class's IRI #110
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…f class's IRI While drafting hand-written example data, it had proved beneficial to some drafters (myself included) to disambiguate `owl:NamedIndividual`s from `owl:Class`es by spelling the class differently in the IRI. Taking `uco-observable:FileFacet` as an example, it was originally frequently written as `FileFacet` when referring to the class, and `file-facet-...` when referring to an individual. Unfortunately, trying to carry this pattern forward is likely to create a technological burden. Camel casing can't always be assumed to apply straightforwardly, and would cause special-case logic to be needed. See e.g.: * `uco-observable:WifiAddressFacet` that would split on capital letters to `kb:wifi-address-facet`, which doesn't seem to be a problem; * `uco-location:GPSCoordinatesFacet` would induce `kb:g-p-s-coordinates-facet`, which seems far less obviously acceptable; * `uco-observable:HTTPConnectionFacet` splitting to `kb:h-t-t-p-connection-facet` may be the last convincing we need. Rather than invest in preserving the lowercased, hyphenated suffix scheme, this patch removes the question and now has individuals use the last path-segment of the class's IRI. A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files. Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
|
I think this PR should wait for merging until after the Adoption Committee meeting on 2023-05-09. |
|
Discussed and approved in the 2023-05-09 Adoption Committee meeting |
ajnelson-nist
added a commit
to casework/CASE-Implementation-ExifTool
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2023
…f class's IRI A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files. References: * casework/CASE-Utilities-Python#110 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
ajnelson-nist
added a commit
to casework/CASE-Implementation-ExifTool
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2023
References: * casework/CASE-Utilities-Python#110 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please see the first patch's log message for this PR's rationale.