|
| 1 | +name: 🚧 Request for Comments (RFC) |
| 2 | +description: Feature design and detailed proposals |
| 3 | +title: "RFC: TITLE" |
| 4 | +labels: ["RFC-proposal", "needs-triage"] |
| 5 | +body: |
| 6 | + - type: markdown |
| 7 | + attributes: |
| 8 | + value: | |
| 9 | + Thank you for submitting a RFC. Please add as many details as possible to help further enrich this design. |
| 10 | + - type: input |
| 11 | + id: relation |
| 12 | + attributes: |
| 13 | + label: Is this related to an existing feature request or issue? |
| 14 | + description: Please share a link, if applicable |
| 15 | + - type: textarea |
| 16 | + id: summary |
| 17 | + attributes: |
| 18 | + label: Summary |
| 19 | + description: Please provide an overview in one or two paragraphs |
| 20 | + validations: |
| 21 | + required: true |
| 22 | + - type: textarea |
| 23 | + id: problem |
| 24 | + attributes: |
| 25 | + label: Use case |
| 26 | + description: Please share the use case and motivation behind this proposal |
| 27 | + validations: |
| 28 | + required: true |
| 29 | + - type: textarea |
| 30 | + id: proposal |
| 31 | + attributes: |
| 32 | + label: Proposal |
| 33 | + description: Please explain the design in detail, so anyone familiar with the project could implement it |
| 34 | + placeholder: What the user experience looks like before and after this design? |
| 35 | + validations: |
| 36 | + required: true |
| 37 | + - type: textarea |
| 38 | + id: scope |
| 39 | + attributes: |
| 40 | + label: Out of scope |
| 41 | + description: Please explain what should be considered out of scope in your proposal |
| 42 | + validations: |
| 43 | + required: true |
| 44 | + - type: textarea |
| 45 | + id: challenges |
| 46 | + attributes: |
| 47 | + label: Potential challenges |
| 48 | + description: Nothing is perfect. Please share what common challenges, edge cases, unresolved areas, and suggestions on how to mitigate them |
| 49 | + validations: |
| 50 | + required: true |
| 51 | + - type: textarea |
| 52 | + id: integrations |
| 53 | + attributes: |
| 54 | + label: Dependencies and Integrations |
| 55 | + description: If applicable, please share whether this feature has additional dependencies, and how it might integrate with other utilities available |
| 56 | + validations: |
| 57 | + required: false |
| 58 | + - type: textarea |
| 59 | + id: alternatives |
| 60 | + attributes: |
| 61 | + label: Alternative solutions |
| 62 | + description: Please describe what alternative solutions to this use case, if any |
| 63 | + render: markdown |
| 64 | + validations: |
| 65 | + required: false |
| 66 | + - type: checkboxes |
| 67 | + id: acknowledgment |
| 68 | + attributes: |
| 69 | + label: Acknowledgment |
| 70 | + options: |
| 71 | + - label: This RFC proposal meets [GenAI CDK constructs design guidelines](https://github.com/awslabs/generative-ai-cdk-constructs/blob/main/DESIGN_GUIDELINES.md) |
| 72 | + required: true |
| 73 | + - type: markdown |
| 74 | + attributes: |
| 75 | + value: | |
| 76 | + --- |
| 77 | +
|
| 78 | + **Disclaimer**: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful. |
| 79 | +
|
| 80 | + Metadata information for admin purposes, please leave them empty. |
| 81 | +
|
| 82 | + * RFC PR: |
| 83 | + * Approved by: '' |
| 84 | + * Reviewed by: '' |
0 commit comments