Skip to content

fix: Pop out ModelPackageName from pipeline definition #3472

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2022

Conversation

qidewenwhen
Copy link
Member

@qidewenwhen qidewenwhen commented Nov 15, 2022

Issue #, if available: If a user provide model_package_name to a ModelStep, the pipeline definition can be successfully generated but it will break the CreatePipeline call with the following error:

botocore.exceptions.ClientError: An error occurred (ValidationException) when calling the CreatePipeline operation: Unable to parse pipeline definition. Unknown Argument member 'ModelPackageName'.

The reason is the pipeline backend excludes this field from the API model.

Description of changes:

  • Pop out ModelPackageName from pipeline definition
  • Add a warning to inform customers about the pop out behavior

Testing done: unit test and integ test

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backward compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: e2b284e
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: e2b284e
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: e2b284e
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 15, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3472 (b226cd1) into master (1fa2377) will decrease coverage by 0.35%.
The diff coverage is 83.65%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3472      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.17%   88.82%   -0.36%     
==========================================
  Files         204      205       +1     
  Lines       18979    19467     +488     
==========================================
+ Hits        16924    17291     +367     
- Misses       2055     2176     +121     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sagemaker/automl/automl.py 91.32% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/huggingface/model.py 89.87% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/pipeline.py 85.33% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/sklearn/model.py 92.98% <ø> (-1.76%) ⬇️
...sagemaker/workflow/monitor_batch_transform_step.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/xgboost/model.py 96.36% <ø> (-1.82%) ⬇️
...agemaker/model_monitor/clarify_model_monitoring.py 89.84% <27.58%> (-5.09%) ⬇️
src/sagemaker/session.py 71.48% <54.54%> (-0.19%) ⬇️
src/sagemaker/training_compiler/config.py 80.43% <60.00%> (-2.90%) ⬇️
src/sagemaker/pytorch/estimator.py 94.73% <63.63%> (-5.27%) ⬇️
... and 38 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: e2b284e
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: b226cd1
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: b226cd1
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: b226cd1
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: b226cd1
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: b226cd1
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@vikas0203 vikas0203 requested review from a team, claytonparnell and vikas0203 and removed request for a team November 23, 2022 20:33
Copy link
Collaborator

@claytonparnell claytonparnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/bot run slow-tests

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: b226cd1
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@knikure knikure merged commit 4570aa6 into aws:master Dec 9, 2022
mizanfiu pushed a commit to mizanfiu/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2022
mufaddal-rohawala pushed a commit to mufaddal-rohawala/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
mufaddal-rohawala pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2022
JoseJuan98 pushed a commit to JoseJuan98/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
JoseJuan98 pushed a commit to JoseJuan98/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
nmadan pushed a commit to nmadan/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants