Skip to content

Feature request: improve return types for AppConfig Parameters #1424

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
dreamorosi opened this issue Apr 28, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1528
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Feature request: improve return types for AppConfig Parameters #1424

dreamorosi opened this issue Apr 28, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1528
Assignees
Labels
completed This item is complete and has been merged/shipped feature-request This item refers to a feature request for an existing or new utility parameters This item relates to the Parameters Utility

Comments

@dreamorosi
Copy link
Contributor

Use case

Note
This is a follow up issue to #1386 and aims at continuing the work started in #1387

Currently when retrieving parameter values from AppConfig, the Parameter utility has somewhat generic return types.

Given that the utility knows both the types returned by the API and the transformation to be applied, there's an opportunity to improve the return types by applying some heuristics.

Solution/User Experience

TBD

Alternative solutions

No response

Acknowledgment

Future readers

Please react with 👍 and your use case to help us understand customer demand.

@dreamorosi dreamorosi added triage This item has not been triaged by a maintainer, please wait feature-request This item refers to a feature request for an existing or new utility labels Apr 28, 2023
@dreamorosi dreamorosi added parameters This item relates to the Parameters Utility discussing The issue needs to be discussed, elaborated, or refined and removed triage This item has not been triaged by a maintainer, please wait labels Apr 28, 2023
@dreamorosi dreamorosi added this to the Parameters - GA Release milestone Apr 28, 2023
@dreamorosi dreamorosi self-assigned this May 2, 2023
@dreamorosi dreamorosi moved this from Backlog to Working on it in AWS Lambda Powertools for TypeScript May 2, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Working on it to Coming soon in Powertools for AWS Lambda (TypeScript) Jun 22, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Working on it to Coming soon in AWS Lambda Powertools for TypeScript Jun 22, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING ⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.

@github-actions github-actions bot added pending-release This item has been merged and will be released soon and removed discussing The issue needs to be discussed, elaborated, or refined labels Jun 22, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 23, 2023

This is now released under version 1.10.0!

@github-actions github-actions bot added completed This item is complete and has been merged/shipped and removed pending-release This item has been merged and will be released soon labels Jun 23, 2023
@dreamorosi dreamorosi moved this from Coming soon to Shipped in Powertools for AWS Lambda (TypeScript) Jun 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
completed This item is complete and has been merged/shipped feature-request This item refers to a feature request for an existing or new utility parameters This item relates to the Parameters Utility
Projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant