Skip to content

Add checks #92

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 10, 2020
Merged

Add checks #92

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 10, 2020

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented Dec 7, 2020

No description provided.

@per1234 per1234 requested review from rsora and silvanocerza December 7, 2020 10:30
Copy link
Contributor

@silvanocerza silvanocerza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some small things to change but the rest if good

@per1234 per1234 force-pushed the per1234/add-checks branch from 56172b6 to 171133b Compare December 7, 2020 19:46
Previously, tests that needed a library without examples used a library that just happened to not have examples for test
data. Using test data specifically intended to provide the necessary conditions will result in less fragile tests.
If a file with one of the names supported by the licensee gem is in the root of the repository containing the text of a
standard license, GitHub recognizes the license type and enables some nice integrations. So having such a file is best
practices.

These checks are only for the presence of the file, rather than their contents.
This checks whether sketch.json is compliant with the expected data format.
@per1234 per1234 force-pushed the per1234/add-checks branch from 171133b to 0ebcb78 Compare December 9, 2020 04:51
@per1234 per1234 merged commit e48c2be into main Dec 10, 2020
@per1234 per1234 deleted the per1234/add-checks branch December 10, 2020 09:49
@per1234 per1234 added topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement labels Sep 29, 2021
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Nov 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants