Skip to content

[skip-changelog] Migrate tests from test_compile_part_1.py to compile_part_1_test.go #1861

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Sep 26, 2022

Conversation

MatteoPologruto
Copy link
Contributor

@MatteoPologruto MatteoPologruto commented Sep 2, 2022

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull Requests
    before creating one)
  • The PR follows
    our contributing guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • UPGRADING.md has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Infrastructure Enhancement

What is the new behavior?

This PR is a followup to PR #1806
Integration tests that were previously present in test_compile_part_1.py have been rewritten in compile_part_1_test.go, without changing their original purpose.
The tests are the following:

  • TestCompileWithoutFqbn
  • TestCompileErrorMessage
  • TestCompileWithSimpleSketch
  • TestOutputFlagDefaultPath
  • TestCompileWithSketchWithSymlinkSelfloop
  • TestCompileBlacklistedSketchname
  • TestCompileWithoutPrecompiledLibraries
  • TestCompileWithBuildPropertiesFlag
  • TestCompileWithBuildPropertyContainingQuotes
  • TestCompileWithMultipleBuildPropertyFlags

Does this PR introduce a breaking change, and is titled accordingly?

No


See how to contribute

@MatteoPologruto MatteoPologruto added type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure labels Sep 2, 2022
@MatteoPologruto MatteoPologruto self-assigned this Sep 2, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 36.58% // Head: 36.60% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (356e5d9) compared to base (5730e2e).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1861      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   36.58%   36.60%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         231      231              
  Lines       19696    19698       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         7206     7211       +5     
+ Misses      11659    11657       -2     
+ Partials      831      830       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 36.60% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/integrationtest/arduino-cli.go 85.45% <100.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
arduino/cores/packagemanager/package_manager.go 66.58% <0.00%> (+0.75%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@MatteoPologruto MatteoPologruto force-pushed the compile-test-go branch 3 times, most recently from 760eecd to 8f59212 Compare September 16, 2022 09:33
@MatteoPologruto MatteoPologruto marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2022 12:41
test_compile_part_1.py to compile_part_1_test.go
…s runner

Long paths caused certain commands to fail on the Windows runner. Reducing their lengths prevents those errors from occurring.
@MatteoPologruto
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tests have been updated. They are now using the copy sketch function when necessary.

@MatteoPologruto MatteoPologruto merged commit 6c3755c into master Sep 26, 2022
@MatteoPologruto MatteoPologruto deleted the compile-test-go branch September 26, 2022 12:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants