Skip to content

Scan Response capabilities missing #186

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
damien-ls opened this issue May 17, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Scan Response capabilities missing #186

damien-ls opened this issue May 17, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@damien-ls
Copy link

It would be a great feature to add the BLE 4.0 Scan Response capabilities as described there: http://www.argenox.com/bluetooth-low-energy-ble-v4-0-development/library/a-ble-advertising-primer/

@mjs513
Copy link

mjs513 commented Jun 1, 2016

This may resolve a problem I am having with getting BLE to work with Processing3 using a BLED112 - not 100% that is the problem since it seems to work fine in Python itself.

@kitsunami kitsunami added this to the Castor milestone Jun 20, 2016
@kitsunami kitsunami modified the milestones: Deneb, Castor Aug 22, 2016
@eriknyquist
Copy link
Contributor

@SidLeung has this issue been addressed by central add + peripheral re-factor?

@noelpaz
Copy link
Contributor

noelpaz commented Oct 11, 2016

This was not implemented. Also the preview BLE from Arduino did not implement this. I asked @sgbihu and @SidLeung about this and I think the BLE stack does not currently support it as well.

Also note that Nordic does not really encourage this capability. We probably should close this and revisit it when we decide too and can do it (meaning we have to change the BLE stack).

@sandeepmistry
Copy link
Contributor

It would be great to get this in the next release. It would allow users to uses the full 31 bytes in the advertising data, then the scan response can be used for the local name.

Also note that Nordic does not really encourage this capability. We probably should close this and revisit it when we decide too and can do it (meaning we have to change the BLE stack).

Do you have a link related to this?

@kitsunami kitsunami assigned noelpaz and unassigned SidLeung Oct 24, 2016
@kitsunami
Copy link

kitsunami commented Feb 24, 2017

Relates to #412 & #458

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants