This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.4k
/
Copy pathdi.ngdoc
294 lines (219 loc) · 10.2 KB
/
di.ngdoc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
@ngdoc overview
@name Dependency Injection
@description
# Dependency Injection
Dependency Injection (DI) is a software design pattern that deals with how components get hold of
their dependencies.
The Angular injector subsystem is in charge of creating components, resolving their dependencies,
and providing them to other components as requested.
For in-depth discussion about DI, see
[Dependency Injection](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection) at Wikipedia,
[Inversion of Control](http://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html) by Martin Fowler,
or read about DI in your favorite software design pattern book.
## DI in a Nutshell
There are only three ways a component (object or function) can get a hold of its dependencies:
1. The component can create the dependency, typically using the `new` operator.
2. The component can look up the dependency, by referring to a global variable.
3. The component can have the dependency passed to it where it is needed.
The first two options of creating or looking up dependencies are not optimal because they hard
code the dependency to the component. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, to modify the
dependencies. This is especially problematic in tests, where it is often desirable to provide mock
dependencies for test isolation.
The third option is the most viable, since it removes the responsibility of locating the
dependency from the component. The dependency is simply handed to the component.
```js
function SomeClass(greeter) {
this.greeter = greeter;
}
SomeClass.prototype.doSomething = function(name) {
this.greeter.greet(name);
}
```
In the above example `SomeClass` is not concerned with creating or locating the `greeter`
dependency, it is simply handed the `greeter` when it is instantiated.
This is desirable, but it puts the responsibility of getting hold of the dependency on the
code that constructs `SomeClass`.
<img class="pull-right" style="padding-left: 3em; padding-bottom: 1em;" src="img/guide/concepts-module-injector.png">
To manage the responsibility of dependency creation, each Angular application has an {@link
angular.injector injector}. The injector is a
[service locator](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_locator_pattern) that is responsible for
construction and lookup of dependencies.
Here is an example of using the injector service:
```js
// Provide the wiring information in a module
var myModule = angular.module('myModule', []);
```
Teach the injector how to build a `greeter` service. Notice that `greeter` is dependent on the
`$window` service. The `greeter` service is an object that contains a `greet` method.
```js
myModule.factory('greeter', function($window) {
return {
greet: function(text) {
$window.alert(text);
}
};
});
```
Create a new injector that can provide components defined in our `myModule` module and request our
`greeter` service from the injector. (This is usually done automatically by angular bootstrap).
```js
var injector = angular.injector(['myModule', 'ng']);
var greeter = injector.get('greeter');
```
Asking for dependencies solves the issue of hard coding, but it also means that the injector needs
to be passed throughout the application. Passing the injector breaks the
[Law of Demeter](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Demeter). To remedy this, we use a declarative
notation in our HTML templates, to hand the responsibility of creating components over to the
injector, as in this example:
```html
<div ng-controller="MyController">
<button ng-click="sayHello()">Hello</button>
</div>
```
```js
function MyController($scope, greeter) {
$scope.sayHello = function() {
greeter.greet('Hello World');
};
}
```
When Angular compiles the HTML, it processes the `ng-controller` directive, which in turn
asks the injector to create an instance of the controller and its dependencies.
```js
injector.instantiate(MyController);
```
This is all done behinds the scenes. Notice that by having the `ng-controller` ask the injector to
instantiate the class, it can satisfy all of the dependencies of `MyController` without the
controller ever knowing about the injector.
This is the best outcome. The application code simply declares the dependencies it needs, without
having to deal with the injector. This setup does not break the Law of Demeter.
## Dependency Annotation
**How does the injector know what components need to be injected?**
The application developer needs to provide annotation information that the injector uses in order
to resolve the dependencies. Throughout Angular, certain API functions are invoked using the
injector, as per the API documentation. The injector needs to know what services to inject into
the function. There are three equivalent ways of annotating your code with service name
information:
- Implicitly from the function parameter names
- Using the `$inject` property annotation
- Using the inline array annotation
These can be used interchangeably as you see fit and are equivalent.
### Implicit Dependencies
The simplest way to get hold of the dependencies, is to assume that the function parameter names
are the names of the dependencies.
```js
function MyController($scope, greeter) {
// ...
}
```
Given a function the injector can infer the names of the service to inject by examining the
function declaration and extracting the parameter names. In the above example `$scope`, and
`greeter` are two services which need to be injected into the function.
While straightforward, this method will not work with JavaScript minifiers/obfuscators as they
rename the method parameter names. This makes this way of annotating only useful for
[pretotyping](http://www.pretotyping.org/), and demo applications.
### `$inject` Property Annotation
To allow the minifers to rename the function parameters and still be able to inject right services,
the function needs to be annotated with the `$inject` property. The `$inject` property is an array
of service names to inject.
```js
var MyController = function(renamed$scope, renamedGreeter) {
...
}
MyController['$inject'] = ['$scope', 'greeter'];
```
In this scenario the ordering of the values in the `$inject` array must match the ordering of the
arguments to inject. Using above code snippet as an example, `$scope` will be injected into
`renamed$scope` and `greeter` into `renamedGreeter`. Care must be taken that the `$inject`
annotation is kept in sync with the actual arguments in the function declaration.
This method of annotation is useful for controller declarations since it assigns the annotation
information with the function.
### Inline Array Annotation
Sometimes using the `$inject` annotation style is not convenient such as when annotating
directives or services defined inline by a factory function.
For example:
```js
someModule.factory('greeter', function($window) {
// ...
});
```
Results in code bloat due to needing a temporary variable:
```js
var greeterFactory = function(renamed$window) {
// ...
};
greeterFactory.$inject = ['$window'];
someModule.factory('greeter', greeterFactory);
```
For this reason the third annotation style is provided as well.
```js
someModule.factory('greeter', ['$window', function(renamed$window) {
// ...
}]);
```
Here, instead of simply providing the factory function, we pass an array, whose elements consist of
a list of strings (the names of the dependencies) followed by the function itself.
Keep in mind that all of the annotation styles are equivalent and can be used anywhere in Angular
where injection is supported.
## Where Can I Use DI?
DI is pervasive throughout Angular. You can use it when defining components or when providing `run`
and `config` blocks for a module.
- Components such as services, directives, filters and animations are defined by an injectable factory
method or constructor function. These components can be injected with "service" components as
dependencies.
- The `run` and `config` methods accept a function, which can also be injected with "service"
components as dependencies.
- Controllers are defined by an constructor function, which can be injected with any of the "service"
components as dependencies, but they can also be provided with special dependencies. See "DI in
Controllers" below.
### Factory Methods
Factory methods are responsible for creating most objects in Angular. Examples are directives,
services, and filters. The factory methods are registered with the module, and the recommended way
of declaring factories is:
```js
angular.module('myModule', [])
.factory('serviceId', ['depService', function(depService) {
...
}])
.directive('directiveName', ['depService', function(depService) {
...
}])
.filter('filterName', ['depService', function(depService) {
...
}]);
```
### Module Methods
We can specify functions to run at configuration and run time for a module by calling the `run` and
`config` methods. These functions are injectable with dependencies just like the factory functions
above.
```js
angular.module('myModule', [])
.config(['depProvider', function(depProvider){
...
}])
.run(['depService', function(depService) {
...
}]);
```
### Controllers
Controllers are "classes" or "constructor functions" that are responsible for providing the
application behavior that supports the declarative markup in the template. The recommended way of
declaring Controllers is using the array notation:
```js
someModule.controller('MyController', ['$scope', 'dep1', 'dep2', function($scope, dep1, dep2) {
...
$scope.aMethod = function() {
...
}
...
}]);
```
This avoids the creation of global functions for controllers and also protects against minification.
Controllers are special in that, unlike services, there can be many instances of them in the
application. For example, there would be one instance for every `ng-controller` directive in the template.
Moreover, additional dependencies are made available to Controllers:
* {@link scope `$scope`}: Controllers are always associated with a point in the DOM and so are provided with
access to the {@link scope scope} at that point. Other components, such as servies only have access to the
singleton {@link $rootScope} service.
* {@link $route} resolves: If a controller is instantiated as part of a route, then any values that
are resolved as part of the route are made available for injection into the controller.