We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As discussed with @filipesilva in #807, the e2e command would benefit from supporting the exclude flag.
exclude
It should accept the presence of the flag multiple times since protractor accepts an array for the exclude configuration (see https://github.com/angular/protractor/blob/master/lib/config.ts#L204).
More generally, it would equally good (at least for me) to support passing arbitrary parameters to protractor via ng e2e like it was the case before.
ng e2e
My use case: #807 (comment).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.
Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.
This action has been performed automatically by a bot.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
As discussed with @filipesilva in #807, the e2e command would benefit from supporting the
exclude
flag.It should accept the presence of the flag multiple times since protractor accepts an array for the
exclude
configuration (see https://github.com/angular/protractor/blob/master/lib/config.ts#L204).More generally, it would equally good (at least for me) to support passing arbitrary parameters to protractor via
ng e2e
like it was the case before.My use case: #807 (comment).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: