-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12k
Docker image & e2e #5019
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I used to have a Docker image (also based on node:7) with iceweasel installed. This worked with CLI versions up to beta.30. Since version 5 (which is the version used since beta.31) protractor uses the marionette driver by default for firefox which is not compatible with iceweasel. Also the webdriver update run by the CLI does not install the marionette driver (it's run with flag
Then there is also the issue that |
I tried to use your chromium install but now I have this message : webpack: Compiled successfully.
[08:31:08] I/direct - Using ChromeDriver directly...
[08:31:08] I/launcher - Running 1 instances of WebDriver
[08:31:08] I/update - chromedriver: file exists /workspace/node_modules/protractor/node_modules/webdriver-manager/selenium/chromedriver_2.26linux64.zip
[08:31:08] I/update - chromedriver: unzipping chromedriver_2.26linux64.zip
[08:31:08] E/launcher - ENOENT: no such file or directory, rename '/workspace/node_modules/protractor/node_modules/webdriver-manager/selenium/chromedriver' -> '/workspace/node_modules/protractor/node_modules/webdriver-manager/selenium/chromedriver_2.26'
[08:31:08] E/launcher - Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, rename '/workspace/node_modules/protractor/node_modules/webdriver-manager/selenium/chromedriver' -> '/workspace/node_modules/protractor/node_modules/webdriver-manager/selenium/chromedriver_2.26'
at Object.fs.renameSync (fs.js:774:18)
at unzip (/workspace/node_modules/protractor/node_modules/webdriver-manager/lib/cmds/update.ts:229:6)
at /workspace/node_modules/protractor/node_modules/webdriver-manager/lib/cmds/update.ts:199:7
at _fulfilled (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:834:54)
at self.promiseDispatch.done (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:863:30)
at Promise.promise.promiseDispatch (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:796:13)
at /workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:604:44
at runSingle (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:137:13)
at flush (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:125:13)
at _combinedTickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:67:7)
at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:98:9)
[08:31:08] E/launcher - Process exited with error code 199 |
There is an issue with |
I tried to use your image, I've got this message : webpack: Compiled successfully.
[23:34:48] I/direct - Using ChromeDriver directly...
[23:34:48] I/launcher - Running 1 instances of WebDriver
[23:35:49] E/launcher - unknown error: Chrome failed to start: exited abnormally
(Driver info: chromedriver=2.26.436382 (70eb799287ce4c2208441fc057053a5b07ceabac),platform=Linux 4.9.8-moby x86_64)
[23:35:49] E/launcher - WebDriverError: unknown error: Chrome failed to start: exited abnormally
(Driver info: chromedriver=2.26.436382 (70eb799287ce4c2208441fc057053a5b07ceabac),platform=Linux 4.9.8-moby x86_64)
at Object.checkLegacyResponse (/workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/lib/error.js:639:15)
at parseHttpResponse (/workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/http/index.js:538:13)
at client_.send.then.response (/workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/http/index.js:472:11)
at ManagedPromise.invokeCallback_ (/workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/lib/promise.js:1379:14)
at TaskQueue.execute_ (/workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/lib/promise.js:2913:14)
at TaskQueue.executeNext_ (/workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/lib/promise.js:2896:21)
at asyncRun (/workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/lib/promise.js:2820:25)
at /workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/lib/promise.js:639:7
at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:103:7)
From: Task: WebDriver.createSession()
at Function.createSession (/workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/lib/webdriver.js:329:24)
at Driver (/workspace/node_modules/selenium-webdriver/chrome.js:778:38)
at Direct.getNewDriver (/workspace/node_modules/protractor/built/driverProviders/direct.js:70:26)
at Runner.createBrowser (/workspace/node_modules/protractor/built/runner.js:198:43)
at /workspace/node_modules/protractor/built/runner.js:277:30
at _fulfilled (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:834:54)
at self.promiseDispatch.done (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:863:30)
at Promise.promise.promiseDispatch (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:796:13)
at /workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:556:49
at runSingle (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:137:13)
at flush (/workspace/node_modules/q/q.js:125:13)
at _combinedTickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:67:7)
at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:98:9)
[23:35:49] E/launcher - Process exited with error code 199 I changed protractor.conf, i put : capabilities: {
'browserName': 'chrome',
'chromeOptions': {
args: ['--no-sandbox']
}
} In my package.json I have : "scripts": {
"e2e": "ng e2e --webdriver-update false",
"pree2e": "yarn run webdriver-manager -- update --standalone false --gecko false"
} And I run the command |
To launch Chrome in a headless environment you need a virtual display (sorry forgot about that...). You need to install Xvfb (which is done together with Chrome in my Dockerfile). You then do |
Good answer by @dasch8, thanks! |
@dasch8 This is not true anymore : https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/04/headless-chrome
No need for Xvfb now. |
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
Hello,
I'm making a docker image to build and test angular cli based applications.
For now my Dockerfile is :
It works pretty fine but
ng e2e
doesn't work, I've got this message for chrome :And for firefox I have :
What am I missing ? For firefox, I guess I'm supposed to install it but node image is based on debian so there is iceweasel package instead of firefox.
What do you suggest ?
Thanks !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: