Skip to content

Commit b3f04f8

Browse files
fix use of accuracy vs rmspe in reg1
1 parent e3f4852 commit b3f04f8

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

source/regression1.md

+3-3
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1057,10 +1057,10 @@ Here we see that the smallest estimated RMSPE from cross-validation occurs when
10571057
If we want to compare this multivariable KNN regression model to the model with only a single
10581058
predictor *as part of the model tuning process* (e.g., if we are running forward selection as described
10591059
in the chapter on evaluating and tuning classification models),
1060-
then we must compare the accuracy estimated using only the training data via cross-validation.
1061-
Looking back, the estimated cross-validation accuracy for the single-predictor
1060+
then we must compare the RMSPE estimated using only the training data via cross-validation.
1061+
Looking back, the estimated cross-validation RMSPE for the single-predictor
10621062
model was {glue:text}`cv_RMSPE`.
1063-
The estimated cross-validation accuracy for the multivariable model is
1063+
The estimated cross-validation RMSPE for the multivariable model is
10641064
{glue:text}`cv_RMSPE_2pred`.
10651065
Thus in this case, we did not improve the model
10661066
by a large amount by adding this additional predictor.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)