You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 19, 2024. It is now read-only.
SECURITY WARNING: You are building a Docker image from Windows against a non-Windows Docker host. All files and directories added to build context will have '-rwxr-xr-x' permissions. It is recommended to double check and reset permissions for sensitive files and directories.
75
103
76
104
Dockerfile : Dockerfile
77
105
ImageName : structure
78
106
Registry :
79
107
Tag : latest
80
108
CommandResult : CommandResult
81
109
```
82
-
In this scenario, you will see the result of the execution which is a PSCustomObject that holds the command result and image name of the image you just created.
83
110
84
-
You can verify the existence of the image using `docker images`
85
-
```
86
-
PS C:\docker> docker images
87
-
```
111
+
In this scenario, you will see the both the output from Docker and the result of the execution which is a PSCustomObject that holds:
88
112
89
-
This is fine when everything goes well. But it's not very practial for troubleshooting. It would be better, if we could get some feedback while on the go.
90
-
To see the output of the Docker command being run, use the `-PassThru` switch of the pertinent CmdLet.
91
-
For example:
113
+
- The path to the Dockerfile being used as the basis for the image.
114
+
- The name of the image being produced.
115
+
- The registry (if unset defaults to Docker's default registry)
116
+
- The command result object which has more detailed information about the execution.
SECURITY WARNING: You are building a Docker image from Windows against a non-Windows Docker host. All files and directories added to build context will have '-rwxr-xr-x' permissions. It is recommended to double check and reset permissions for sensitive files and directories.
119
150
```
151
+
in which case you will only see the output from Docker, the result object is stored in $result.
120
152
121
-
Now, we get both the result and the output from the docker command.
122
-
123
-
In most cases you will want to store the result in a variable for further processing or output to a CI/CD pipeline, like so:
124
-
153
+
You can verify the existence of the image you just created using `docker images`
Which would then output the status of the command and store the final result object in `$result`.
158
+
If you want less output, use `-Quiet` switch to output only the final result of the command. Combined with storing the result in a variable, this will give a completely silent execution of the CmdLet.
159
+
160
+
### Disabling verbose output
161
+
The -Quiet setting for CmdLets that support it, defaults to the value of the enviromenment variable `DOCKER_CI_QUIET_MODE`.
162
+
So you can set this environment variable to the desired setting for the `-Quiet` switch so you don't have to set it for each invocation of a cmdlet that supports it.
130
163
131
164
### Linting a Dockerfile
132
165
An important aspect of writing quality Docker images is to try and learn from the best in the community. To this end, we provide a convenient way to run `hadolint` against a Dockerfile. Hadolint is a 3rd party component that scans a dockerfile and produces linted output. You can find the hadolint project here: https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint
@@ -135,7 +168,6 @@ Here's how to use the linter via a CmdLet:
This Dockerfile in particular has no linting remarks, so it is just output in its entirety with line numbers. Being a mere human, I will forget things from time to time. Let's imagine I omitted the instruction in line 3 on how to deal with commands that fail in a piped execution and run the same commands:
193
+
This Dockerfile in particular has no linting remarks, so it is just output in its entirety with line numbers. Imagine I omitted the instruction in line 3 on how to deal with commands that fail in a piped execution and run the linting again:
0 commit comments